I'm not going to lie - the election is this weekend and it's only till today that I took the initiative to try and understand what is going on with the Greece Debt Crisis.
What went wrong?
When Greece joined the European Union in 1981, it benefited from an economic boom when wealthy European and North Americans considered it as a popular tourist destination. Unfortunately, this turned sour when tourists began to feel that the Greeks were overcharging them. While the tourist industry is going downhill, switching to the euro currency did not help in 2001. After the switch, the government sector could not sustain the rapid increase in wages, let alone dish out generous benefits to those retiring. Official retirement age in Greece is 58. Despite all these, the big blow to the Greek economy is mass tax evasion. When the government doesn't get its money from taxation, who does it turn to? European banks. In estimation, Athens is 54 billion euros ($74 billion) in debt and much of this debt is due in fast approaching months.
What is the world's eyes on right now? Deal or no deal?
Greece takes the deal
Up until the current crisis, the EU and IMF have already provided 110 billion euros of bailout loans in 2010 and another 130 billion euros earlier this year. Private creditors have written off more than half of Athens' debt and decreased the rate of the rest of the loans. Another offer is in place should Greece decides to accept it. European banks are willing to take on about half of whatever is owed. The potential deal-breaker is that Greece must agree to austerity. This includes cut-backs on government spending, which of course decreases pay for public employees, and agreement to stagger repayment of debt. This means that the country will fall into a spiraling debt. It is believed that unemployment will be driven up while shrinking the economy and lowering living standard.
Greece defaults
To default and drop the euro to return to the drachma (ancient Greek currency), Greek export will benefit from becoming cheap. I could not, however, think of any other reasons to default. Greek banks, which are creditors to the government, will go bankrupt in no time. It takes at least four months to introduce a new currency. While the drachma is trying to settle, inflation will reach sky high.
To conclude, it appears that the outcome of the election on June 17 will hit the rest of the world at a steeper angle than it would at Greece itself. If the election favors the pro-austerity parties, the EU and IMF will put the international economy back in spin for yet another day. If the anti-austerity parties win, Greece will freeze all loan payments. All faith is then lost on the European market. As for Greece, it has already hit rock bottom, unless there is another layer of calamity to it.
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy. Show all posts
Thursday, June 14, 2012
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
ObamaCare (Part II)
Continuing from "ObamaCare (Part I)": http://student-eyes.blogspot.com/2012/06/obamacare-part-i.html
The first case of mumps in Berkeley's academic year broke out from the house I was living in. This was inevitable for a house, called Cloyne Court Casino Hotel, roofed over 200 hippies. But I'll save the discussion of Cloyne's hygiene, or the lack of it, in another post. Waking up one morning with a sore throat and runny nose, I immediately checked myself in with the health center. I left the center with a dozen paracetamol in a white paper box and with $10 less in my wallet. Five dollars for the consultant and another five for the prescription.
One would have hoped that the $1626 insurance could tide me over a common cold. What is the cause to such an advance country's bank-breaker healthcare? Later on, I downloaded onto my Kindle "Believe in America: Mitt Romney's Plan for Jobs and Economic Growth" for the price of $0.00. This generosity is currently still available here: http://www.amazon.com/Believe-America-Romneys-Economic-ebook/dp/B005LEY5Q0/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1339491089&sr=1-1
The book says that the Obama administration aimed to 'radically change health insurance and healthcare'. How? Below are the two main objectives of ObamaCare:
- Insure everyone (legal American citizens, that is).
- Impose greater government regulation over insurance policies and medicare.
So why don't Americans buy into the change?
To ensure that all Americans are insured, employers are now required to either provide their employees with insurance or pay out to the ObamaCare. Is this mandatory fringe benefit going to encourage employment? The simple answer is no. This increases unemployment rate and Besides, if the unemployed are also given health insurance, someone must be paying for them. Tax payers are paying for them. The reform is projected to cost about $1000 billion in the next decade. The middle class and small businesses are hurting most when tax in US is higher than majority if not all of Europe.
What about giving the federal government the power to decide that you take the blue pill instead of the red pill because it's half the price of the red pill and works just as fine? Would you be willing to let the government be the judge of you taking painkiller instead of having surgery? Those rooting for ObamaCare say that a tougher regulation raises competition amongst insurance providers. The only problem is that the White House is the big player and the big ref - another piece of evidence of Barack Obama's skepticism for the private sector.
So unless you're like the Chinese guy I sat next to in class, you might just have to swallow the ObamaCare pill.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

